Careers Contact Us

Rebuild the 60/40 with Low-Correlating Solutions

December 2025
Image of feet on steps

Given the wide range of economic uncertainties, including existing pressure on growth and inflation, investors should consider a more diversified asset allocation than 60/40. As shown in the chart below, a 60/20/20* portfolio has historically outperformed a 60/40 portfolio over the last four decades, while frequently providing higher risk-adjusted returns (as measured by Sharpe Ratio).

Download Chart >

 

Key Takeaways
Poor diversification can have a meaningful impact on long-term results as growth can unexpectedly be down and inflation unexpectedly up for uncertain periods of time.
A 60/20/20 portfolio seeks to provide a stable return stream and enhance diversification.
A $100K allocation to a 60/20/20 portfolio in 1986 would today be worth over $4.5M versus $3.5M for a 60/40 allocation.